(05-24-2016 01:47 PM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2016 11:18 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/PlayOverwatch/status...1274150912
So how bout them Homestuck Overwatch devs.
And suddenly the Chinese ripoff is the better version.
Don't worry, it's just an elaborate prank made just to keep you from buying it. I wouldn't want to play with you online either.
(05-25-2016 06:09 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2016 01:47 PM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ] (05-24-2016 11:18 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/PlayOverwatch/status...1274150912
So how bout them Homestuck Overwatch devs.
And suddenly the Chinese ripoff is the better version.
Don't worry, it's just an elaborate prank made just to keep you from buying it. I wouldn't want to play with you online either.
Okay, just do me a favor and say hello to the LoL crowd when it launches.
I'd say when it becomes free to play but both Activision and Blizzard are too cheap for that.
Why overwatch isn't free-to-play is just baffling, if anything, it'll just make Blizzard more money in the long run. And who the fuck wants to pay $70 for an RTS FPS?
(05-25-2016 10:19 PM)neo_ozon Wrote: [ -> ]Why overwatch isn't free-to-play is just baffling, if anything, it'll just make Blizzard more money in the long run. And who the fuck wants to pay $70 for an RTS FPS?
It's 40 US dollars.
Whether it's worth it or not, I won't say.
But it's much more polished than most shooters.
Reviews:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/...ew_thread/
(05-25-2016 10:19 PM)neo_ozon Wrote: [ -> ]Why overwatch isn't free-to-play is just baffling, if anything, it'll just make Blizzard more money in the long run. And who the fuck wants to pay $70 for an RTS FPS?
Apparently people who want a community with as small an amount of children as possible, stability of the game while online, and not having to pay money towards upgrades; not to mention far less of a chance at pay to win.
(05-25-2016 11:25 PM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ]But it's much more polished than most shooters.
Surely you jest.
"Big name vidja critics"
It's like you're not even trying.
"Reddit"
![[Image: 5zlGrVV.png]](http://i.imgur.com/5zlGrVV.png)
(05-26-2016 07:25 AM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ]snop
since when did you care about american politics
I thought you preferred your GLORIOUS NIPPON POLITICS, FOLDED OVER ONE THOUSAND TIMES
(05-26-2016 09:33 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 07:25 AM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ]snop
since when did you care about american politics
I thought you preferred your GLORIOUS NIPPON POLITICS, FOLDED OVER ONE THOUSAND TIMES
I never cared about any politics til Hillary happened.
How would a belly with ONE THOUSAND FOLDs look like?
(05-26-2016 02:11 PM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 09:33 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 07:25 AM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ]snop
since when did you care about american politics
I thought you preferred your GLORIOUS NIPPON POLITICS, FOLDED OVER ONE THOUSAND TIMES
How would a belly with ONE THOUSAND FOLDs look like?
It depends if it's big or not. I do like folds tho, so
(05-26-2016 09:01 PM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 02:11 PM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 09:33 AM)kawaiiChiimera Wrote: [ -> ] (05-26-2016 07:25 AM)Chaos Wrote: [ -> ]snop
since when did you care about american politics
I thought you preferred your GLORIOUS NIPPON POLITICS, FOLDED OVER ONE THOUSAND TIMES
How would a belly with ONE THOUSAND FOLDs look like?
It depends if it's big or not. I do like folds tho, so
Of course it would be massive; a small belly would look weird with all that going on with nothing filling them.
![[Image: Vw64vBv.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/Vw64vBv.jpg)